About Us

Services

Shop

Laboratory

Blog

Case Studies

Accreditations

Testimonials

Our Customers

Contact

Our Customers



Shop Basket

My Account

Make a Payment


Careers

Terms

Privacy

Returns and Refund Policy

Cookies

Terms  |  Privacy  |  Cookies

Get Back To Me

Call us on 0800 433 7914, or provide your name & email address below and we'll email you about our service:

Hazardous Substances Grantham

Hazardous Substance Assessment in Grantham

A recent assessment was conducted at a site in Grantham to evaluate the exposure of workers to hazardous substances in the fettling area. The primary goal was to monitor air quality and determine if employees working with metal dust, particularly copper and tin, were being exposed to levels exceeding the Workplace Exposure Limits (WELs).

The results showed that while the exposure to tin was well within acceptable limits, the concentration of copper dust exceeded the WEL, posing a potential health risk. Workers in the fettling area, who use power tools to smooth metal surfaces, are particularly affected by dust created during these processes.

Key recommendations from the report include improving local exhaust ventilation (LEV) systems, better housekeeping practices like avoiding dry sweeping to minimise dust clouds, and ensuring the consistent use of respiratory protective equipment (RPE). Additionally, job rotation and limiting the time workers spend in high-exposure areas were suggested to reduce personal exposure levels.

By implementing these control measures, the facility can significantly reduce the health risks associated with hazardous substance exposure, ensuring a safer environment for all employees.


Hazardous Substances Assessment in Grantham

In July 2024, Our team conducted an assessment for hazardous substances at a manufacturing facility in Grantham. The company, which designs and builds garden structures, wanted to check if their workers were being exposed to dangerous levels of chemicals, especially in the painting area.The assessment involved air monitoring to measure levels of various volatile organic compounds and other potentially harmful substances. Samples were collected both from workers' breathing zones and at fixed locations around the facility. The results were then compared to legal workplace exposure limits.

While most substance levels were found to be within acceptable ranges, xylene concentrations in the painting area were getting close to concerning levels. They weren't over the legal limits, but high enough to warrant some attention. Based on these findings, the report recommends a few improvements. The main suggestions are to look into installing better ventilation in the painting area and to consider doing some biological monitoring of workers to check for overall chemical exposure.
Overall, the assessment helps the company understand their current situation and take proactive steps to protect workers' health. It's part of their ongoing efforts to comply with health and safety regulations.