About Us

Services

Shop

Laboratory

Blog

Case Studies

Accreditations

Testimonials

Our Customers

Contact

Our Customers



Shop Basket

My Account

Make a Payment


Careers

Terms

Privacy

Returns and Refund Policy

Cookies

Terms  |  Privacy  |  Cookies

Get Back To Me

Call us on 0800 433 7914, click here to email us with your enquiry, or provide your name & email address below and we'll email you about our service:

Hazardous Substances Sheffield

Hazardous Substances Assessment – Sheffield

Our team conducted and assessment that involved assessing potential exposure to hazardous substances at a site in Sheffield, focusing mainly on hydrocarbons used in the finishing room and coating area. The goal was to measure how much of these substances employees were exposed to, identify the areas where exposure might happen, and recommend ways to control risks.

Air monitoring was carried out, and while the levels of hydrocarbons were below the legal exposure limits, they still reached a point that requires attention. The main concern was around finishing activities where certain hydrocarbons were present, though they didn’t surpass critical levels. Proper ventilation was suggested, and the use of respiratory masks that actually protect against vapours was recommended, as disposable dust masks aren’t up to the task.

The key takeaway was that the site should improve how they store volatile chemicals, ensuring containers are kept sealed when not in use to minimise exposure. Overall, the site was found to be compliant with safety regulations, but some improvements could further lower the risk. Regular checks and possible adjustments to ventilation would help maintain a safer environment.


Hazardous Substances Assessment at Sheffield Lab

We recently completed a hazardous substances assessment at a lab in Sheffield. Our main task was to evaluate employees' exposure to harmful substances during the cleaning of the Silica J Liner. Using both personal and static air sampling methods, we measured concentrations of arsenic, phosphorus, and indium in the air.

The results were promising, showing that the levels of these substances were well below the Workplace Exposure Limits (WELs). However, we did notice moderate concentrations of contaminants on certain surfaces, suggesting that a thorough cleaning was needed in those areas. We also conducted biological monitoring, which revealed that one operative had arsenic levels above the Biological Monitoring Guidance Values (BMGV), indicating possible exposure from other processes within 48 hours of the assessment.

We recommended maintaining the current local exhaust ventilation (LEV) and respiratory protective equipment (RPE) controls, along with regular health surveillance and training for employees on safe handling practices. This assessment reinforces the importance of continuous monitoring and proper safety measures to ensure a healthy working environment.