Hazardous Substances Sussex

Hazardous Substances Assessment in Chichester Laboratory

Sysco Environmental carried out a thorough assessment of hazardous substances exposure in a laboratory setting in Chichester. The project, conducted by an environmental consultancy, aimed to evaluate occupational exposure to various potentially harmful chemicals and ensure compliance with health and safety regulations. The assessment encompassed two primary areas: the main laboratory and a separate dissection laboratory. Researchers employed both personal and static air monitoring techniques to measure the concentration of hazardous substances in the workplace atmosphere. The study focused on chemicals commonly used in laboratory processes, including formaldehyde, xylene, and ethanol.Key findings revealed that while hazardous substances were present, their levels were generally below the established Workplace Exposure Limits. The report highlighted the effectiveness of existing control measures, such as local exhaust ventilation systems and enclosed processes, in minimising employee exposure. Despite the positive results, the assessment identified areas for improvement. Recommendations included:

• Enhancing respiratory protection practices
• Optimising ventilation systems
• Implementing more rigorous biological monitoring
• Improving documentation and record-keeping

Overall, this assessment provides valuable insights into the management of hazardous substances in a laboratory environment. By identifying both strengths and areas for improvement, it offers a roadmap for enhancing workplace safety and ensuring regulatory compliance. The findings underscore the importance of proactive measures in protecting employee health and maintaining a safe working environment when dealing with potentially harmful substances.

Hazardous Substances Assessment at Training Facility in East Sussex

Sysco Enviromental conducted a hazardous substances assessment at a training facility in Uckfield. The project aimed to evaluate occupational exposure to various hazardous materials during training activities and propose control measures to ensure staff safety. The assessment focused on two main areas: an indoor training room and an outdoor training station. Investigators monitored air quality, measuring levels of inhalable dust, respirable dust, and respirable crystalline silica. They observed training sessions, including glass and door cutting demonstrations, as well as concrete block cutting exercises. 

Results revealed some concerning exposure levels, particularly for inhalable dust in the training room and respirable crystalline silica at the outdoor station. These exceeded workplace exposure limits during certain activities. However, the report notes that the monitored sessions represented a "worst-case scenario" with more demonstrations than typical, potentially skewing the results. To provide a more balanced view, Sysco calculated weekly time-weighted averages, considering that high-exposure activities occur infrequently. This analysis showed lower overall exposure levels but still highlighted the need for improved safety measures. Our report offered several recommendations to mitigate risks. For the indoor training room, these include enhancing ventilation, restructuring sessions to reduce occupancy, and improving cleaning practices. Outdoor recommendations focus on continued use of water for dust suppression during drilling activities. Throughout both areas, the importance of proper respiratory protective equipment (RPE) is Highlighted. The report also stresses the need for ongoing monitoring and adjustment of safety protocols.

In conclusion, while the assessment identified some areas of concern, it also provided a roadmap for improving safety at the facility. By implementing the suggested measures, the training centre can better protect its staff and trainees from hazardous substance exposure while maintaining effective training programmes.